Regulating Buses

Bleecker St Tour Buses and Lanes

With more than 100 double decker tour buses a day, Bleecker St. in Greenwich Village, has become a major tourist thoroughfare from West to East. Like many streets in residential neighborhoods, its single lane for moving traffic and a bike lane was never intended to absorb this commerical overload.

The rapid increase of inter-state, intra-state, chartered, tour, and sightseeing buses is, still, largely unregulated.  While a key component in the growth of NYC’s tourism industry, the increased traffic, safety and environmental impacts on residential neighborhoods and congestion on major commercial crossroads still needs serious and thoughtful attention.

In response to concerns raised by Our Streets Our Lives, the Tri-State Transportation Campaign,  Manhattan community-based organizations in Chelsea, Hells Kitchen, at Lincoln Center, Central Park West, in Harlem, in Chinatown, at Battery Park, the South Street Seaport, as well as Dumbo and Fulton Ferry Landing in Brooklyn, State Senator Daniel Squadron and State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver introduced legislation in February to authorize New York City to pass a local law to regulate intercity passenger bus service through a permit system.  Provisions of the proposed legislation included:

  1. 1.  Prohibiting intercity buses from picking up and dropping off passengers on city streets without a permit that defines approved pick-up and drop off locations.

2.  Assigning a city agency to implement and enforce the permitting system.

3.  Establishing a community board review process for issuing permits and designating locations/relocations for bus pick-up and drop-off

4.  Requiring consultation with the MTA in designating locations/relocations for bus pick-up and drop-off and issuance of permits

5.  Providing for public notice of all permit applications within five days of submission

6.  Requiring applicants to obtain five thousand dollar surety bonds

7.  Mandating agency review, and approval or denial, within ninety days of submission of application.

8.  Requiring the display of permits in buses

9.  Exempting a number of vehicles, including school buses, sight-seeing buses, transportation authority buses, municipal buses and others

10.  Authorizing a maximum $275 annual fee to be credited to the city as well as civil penalties for violations

11.  Prohibiting the adoption of any system until there has been a public hearing

While the legislation received broad support by the New York City Council , it remains in the State Senate Transportation Committee.

The refinements we, and a number of others, including CB#4 Manhattan recommend include:

  1. Giving NYC DOT authority to regulate the routes and parking of all buses.  Interstate, intra-state, commuter vans, charter, tour and sightseeing buses (double-decker) should all be subject to permitting to provide a consistent approach to all curb and street allocation between various intermodal transportation uses. This will also allow evaluating whether each community carries no more than its fair share of the routes and stops.  Further there should be a limit on the number of parking permits issued by the city.
  2. Designation of approved routes.  All buses should be permitted to travel on approved routes for reaching their destinations. Streets serving residential districts, schools, senior centers or landmarked districts are not appropriate for the size of these vehicles which pose special burdens on pedestrian safety and the structural integrity of ancient infrastructures.
  3. Permits that spell out the bus operator’s responsibilities in managing the pick up /drop off locations:  idling should be banned during loading and unloading; a rope should separate the queues from the pedestrian flow and retain the 8 ft pedestrian right-of-way required of all NYC sidewalk incursions. 
  4. Surety bonds as a permitting requirement, in an amount commensurate to the bus company’s – or their parent company – annual revenue.
  5. Raising the cap on annual fees.  The proposed legislation caps the fee per bus per year at $ 250.  Sidewalk space and curb space are at a premium in the city, the fee should compensate the city for revenue other curb uses would have generated.  For instance annual revenue from three muni-meters (the amount of space a bus would take) is more than $39,000/yr.; for a sidewalk café in the 34th St area that revenue is more then $19,000/yr. 
    As a point of reference, a recent inquiry to the NYC Office Of The Comptroller has confirmed that “Bus companies that operate sightseeing buses pay a fee of $100 per bus for a two year license.  In FY10 the City collected $20,725 of fees for such buses.”
  6. Enforcement.   This legislation does not make clear who will be enforcing locations, pedestrian right-of-ways, routes, EPA issues such as idling, etc.

And none of this precludes the need for a comprehensive plan for garages and layovers throughout the City that will not infringe on residential neighborhoods for charter buses, charter tour buses as well as interstate buses.  Tourism and intermodal transportation are, and will be, an important part of New York City’s fiscal and green strategy for many years to come.  We need to get this right. 

We do have one benchmark to celebrate, however.  As of July 2011 at least 10% of all hop-on hop-off buses should be using headphones instead of public PA systems on their tours as our 2010 Local Law 15 legislation prescribes.

Ellen Peterson Lewis, Chair, Transportation

Barbara Backer, Chair, Pro Tempore

 

Long-Term Planning and Shorter-Term Relief

Narrow Streets with Parking and Bike Lanes Leave No Room for Turning Buses

Narrow Streets with Parking and Bike Lanes Leave No Room for Turning Buses

Our Streets Our Lives which advocates for City jurisdiction and Community input on tour buses, charter buses, commuter buses and hop-on-hop -off double decker buses is working with the West Side Clean Air Campaign (Manhattan) and with Dumbo and The Fullton Landing groups (in Brooklyn) on new opportunities to affect issues of bus traffic, routing, parking, noise and emissions.

This Tuesday, October 19, 2010 the Mayor’s Office of Long-Term Planning and Sustainability is hosting a Community Conversation to talk about future sustainability initiatives to be included in the updated PlaNYC… and you’re invited:

Tuesday, October19, 2010 – 6:00 pm to 8:pm
Borough of Manhattan Community College (BMCC)
TriBeCa Performing Arts Center, Theater 2,
199 Chambers, Theater 2, NY, NY 10007
Enter through Main Lobby
Please RSVP: Call 212-788-9770 or email CountMeIn@cityhall.nyc.gov
The closest train is the 1, 2 or 3 to Chambers St. 

We urge your attendance and input.  Please RSVP by calling 212-788-9770 or emailing CountMeIn@cityhall.nyc.govIf you are not able to attend, be sure to include your thoughts in an e-mail.   

The first edition of New York City’s sustainability plan, PlaNYC, was released in 2007.  By law the plan has to be updated every four years. The Mayor’s Office of Long-Term Planning and Sustainability is working on the next draft, which, by law, must be renewed every four years, due on Earth Day – Friday, April 22, 2011. 

Issues to Address in the PlaNYC Update 

While Interstate charter and tour buses provide an economical and efficient service for growing numbers of tourists and commuters, their operation and regulation is largely under State and Federal control.  For an already congested City this presents a variety of issues that will only become larger as the fleets and routes expand.  But New York City can plan for more control useful for the whole regulatory environment. 

The effects of increased non-City buses is apparent not only at major NYC crossroads but in residential neighborhoods and on narrow streets, as well.  The dedicated 34th Street Bus Lane is obstructed by long distance buses 75 % of the time.  42nd Street and Chinatown bus lanes experience similar blockage; the supply of appropriate curbside space for layover is vastly insufficient (50%) and is rapidly shrinking due to residential re-zoning and more bike lanes.  In Chelsea and Hells Kitchen in Manhattan, the average number of departures and arrivals of long-distance buses is currently 400 per day.  The Upper West Side -The Dakota, Central Park West (Strawberry Fields), The Museum of Natural History areas; Greenwich Village,Chinatown, Battery Park, South Street Seaport, as well as Brooklyn’s Dumbo and Fulton Ferry Landing experience similar volume.  Over the next ten years tourist travel to the World Trade Center redevelopment site and Lower Manhattan is expected to triple that number.

In addition to the congestion there are emission issues:  Buses using short curbside parking for loading and discharging passengers tend to idle their engines to maintain climate control.  The 400 departures and arrivals, with 10 minutes of idling each totals 66 hours per day of idling emissions, in Chelsea and Hell’s Kitchen, alone. 

There are shorter-term improvements that should be in this plan, as well, such as routing and stop registration.  The current practice of sharing New York City’s dedicated bus lanes negatively impacts MTA Bus Service.  The growing use of narrower residential streets is not only intrusive, but impractical.  The turning radius of a bus (making any corner) is 45 feet, while most of our residential streets are barely 24 feet wide.  Areas designated for on-street parking and bike lanes reduce the lane availability even further.

Two Solutions

(1)  New York City needs to plan for Charter and Tour Bus Garages as well as Commuter and Long Distance Bus Garages.  PlaNYC can prepare the way for suitable infrastructure to support our growing tourist industry and growing use of High Occupancy Vehicles.  In the 2005 Hudson Yards re-zoning, the city committed to building a garage to accommodate bus parking needs.  Similar planning needs to occur for the City’s high-tourist areas, among them Chinatown and the World Trade Center Memorial. 

(2)  A plan for designated routes and stops, particularly for tour buses and hop-on-hop-off busses is sorely needed.  While there are still the State and Federal regulatory issues, New York City can plan and enforce registered routes and stopover locations as part of operating licensing.   The Department of Transportation (DOT)-with the community boards input – could oversee the process to minimize disruption to our neighborhoods and the City’s overall traffic flows.  This also provides a better and more consistent platform for local enforcement.