Tour and Inter-City Bus Stops – Community Workshop Thursday, Nov. 1st

Tour and Inter-City Bus Stop Workshop at Hotel Pennsylvania

Tour and inter-city bus stops will be the topic for community workshops to help NYC Dept of Transportation determine the criteria to evaluate proposals!

Thursday, November 1, 2012
6:00 p.m.
Hotel Pennsylvania – Gold Ballroom
401 7th Ave. – Between W. 32nd St. & W. 33rd St.

New legislation has allowed the New York City Department of Transportation to make rules to help control where the growing intercity bus industry can pick-up and drop-off riders.

Take an active role in shaping stop location criteria!

Community Approval on Inter-City Buses No Slam-Dunk

Inter-City Bus Proposal at Seward-Park

Anti-Essex St. bus stop flyer circulated at CB#3.  Photo courtesy Inhabitat New York City

On September 11th CB#3 Manhattan heard  the proposal to add loading and unloading stops for Greyhound/Peter Pan inter-city buses next to the children’s playground at Seward Park.  Opponents armed with letters, postcards and a 1,100 signature petition  addressed the Transportation Committee and several officials from Greyhound and Peter Pan.  Notably absent was representation from the Department of Transportation.

The Lo-Down reported:   “…the committee decided (with considerable goading from the crowd) to send an unambiguous message to the DOT. The resolution it approved stated that the community board objects to the Essex Street stop proposal for inter-city buses and asked the Transportation Department to suggest alternate locations. “

Unfortunately,  the Department of Transportation decided to approve of the new stops for Chinatown interlopers Greyhound and Peter Pan bus lines anyway, but by Tuesday, Sept 25th, two days before the Greyhound/PeterPan YO bus line was scheduled to board their first passengers at the Seward Park Playground,  a letter signed by Assembly Speaker Silver,  Senator Dan Squadron and City Councilmember Margaret Chin persuaded DOT to take another look at the situation.

On Monday, Oct. 1st the Lo-Down, in an exhaustive piece on the subject, reported:

… the DOT is working on alternative locations, which will be presented to Community Board 3.  Susan Stetzer, CB3?s district manager, tells us the city will not appear at this month’s transportation committee meeting with a new plan but will likely be on the November agenda.

In Chinatown as elsewhere, finding room for the highly popular, low-cost inter-city buses is not an easy task.

Finally – Inter-City buses required to have permits and community approvals

 

Sen Dan Squadron introducing legislation on inter-city buses

Sen Dan Squadron introducing legislation on inter-city buses, photo courtesy Tri-State Transportation Campaign

As reported by DNA Info back in August, inter-city buses will face new regulations, thanks to a law Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed in response to back-to-back bus crashes that left 17 people dead last year.

The new law, which takes effect December 1st, requires all inter-city buses, including those based in Chinatown, to apply for permits and to park in bus stops that are designated with community input.

For the first time, inter-city bus companies will also have to disclose information about their fleet, including schedules, where the inter-city buses park during layovers, the number and type of buses and the number of passengers each inter-city bus can carry.

Any inter-city buses that violate the new regulations will face fines of up to $2,500.

“This new law will help bring much needed oversight to the inter-city bus industry and will help improve the quality of life for my Chinatown constituents, as well as residents across the city who face the dangers and inconvenience of inter-city buses idling and blocking intersections,” said Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, who co-sponsored the bill with State Sen. Daniel Squadron.

Among the important provisions is strong language requiring community review:

Require the city, prior to assigning an inter-city bus stop, to consult with local community boards and the MTA (if an intercity bus stop would overlap with an MTA bus stop), and to consider traffic, safety, and applicant preferences;

Require that applicants, the local community board and the MTA (if applicable) receive notification prior to an inter-city bus stop being relocated.

Require the city, prior to issuing a permit or permanently amending a permit, to consult with the local community board, including a 45 day notice and comment period

Read more:

http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20120817/chinatown/new-chinatown-bus-rules-signed-into-law

http://chekpeds.com/congratulations-governor-cuomo-signed-the-bus-permit-bill-into-law

Regulating Buses

Bleecker St Tour Buses and Lanes

With more than 100 double decker tour buses a day, Bleecker St. in Greenwich Village, has become a major tourist thoroughfare from West to East. Like many streets in residential neighborhoods, its single lane for moving traffic and a bike lane was never intended to absorb this commerical overload.

The rapid increase of inter-state, intra-state, chartered, tour, and sightseeing buses is, still, largely unregulated.  While a key component in the growth of NYC’s tourism industry, the increased traffic, safety and environmental impacts on residential neighborhoods and congestion on major commercial crossroads still needs serious and thoughtful attention.

In response to concerns raised by Our Streets Our Lives, the Tri-State Transportation Campaign,  Manhattan community-based organizations in Chelsea, Hells Kitchen, at Lincoln Center, Central Park West, in Harlem, in Chinatown, at Battery Park, the South Street Seaport, as well as Dumbo and Fulton Ferry Landing in Brooklyn, State Senator Daniel Squadron and State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver introduced legislation in February to authorize New York City to pass a local law to regulate intercity passenger bus service through a permit system.  Provisions of the proposed legislation included:

  1. 1.  Prohibiting intercity buses from picking up and dropping off passengers on city streets without a permit that defines approved pick-up and drop off locations.

2.  Assigning a city agency to implement and enforce the permitting system.

3.  Establishing a community board review process for issuing permits and designating locations/relocations for bus pick-up and drop-off

4.  Requiring consultation with the MTA in designating locations/relocations for bus pick-up and drop-off and issuance of permits

5.  Providing for public notice of all permit applications within five days of submission

6.  Requiring applicants to obtain five thousand dollar surety bonds

7.  Mandating agency review, and approval or denial, within ninety days of submission of application.

8.  Requiring the display of permits in buses

9.  Exempting a number of vehicles, including school buses, sight-seeing buses, transportation authority buses, municipal buses and others

10.  Authorizing a maximum $275 annual fee to be credited to the city as well as civil penalties for violations

11.  Prohibiting the adoption of any system until there has been a public hearing

While the legislation received broad support by the New York City Council , it remains in the State Senate Transportation Committee.

The refinements we, and a number of others, including CB#4 Manhattan recommend include:

  1. Giving NYC DOT authority to regulate the routes and parking of all buses.  Interstate, intra-state, commuter vans, charter, tour and sightseeing buses (double-decker) should all be subject to permitting to provide a consistent approach to all curb and street allocation between various intermodal transportation uses. This will also allow evaluating whether each community carries no more than its fair share of the routes and stops.  Further there should be a limit on the number of parking permits issued by the city.
  2. Designation of approved routes.  All buses should be permitted to travel on approved routes for reaching their destinations. Streets serving residential districts, schools, senior centers or landmarked districts are not appropriate for the size of these vehicles which pose special burdens on pedestrian safety and the structural integrity of ancient infrastructures.
  3. Permits that spell out the bus operator’s responsibilities in managing the pick up /drop off locations:  idling should be banned during loading and unloading; a rope should separate the queues from the pedestrian flow and retain the 8 ft pedestrian right-of-way required of all NYC sidewalk incursions. 
  4. Surety bonds as a permitting requirement, in an amount commensurate to the bus company’s – or their parent company – annual revenue.
  5. Raising the cap on annual fees.  The proposed legislation caps the fee per bus per year at $ 250.  Sidewalk space and curb space are at a premium in the city, the fee should compensate the city for revenue other curb uses would have generated.  For instance annual revenue from three muni-meters (the amount of space a bus would take) is more than $39,000/yr.; for a sidewalk café in the 34th St area that revenue is more then $19,000/yr. 
    As a point of reference, a recent inquiry to the NYC Office Of The Comptroller has confirmed that “Bus companies that operate sightseeing buses pay a fee of $100 per bus for a two year license.  In FY10 the City collected $20,725 of fees for such buses.”
  6. Enforcement.   This legislation does not make clear who will be enforcing locations, pedestrian right-of-ways, routes, EPA issues such as idling, etc.

And none of this precludes the need for a comprehensive plan for garages and layovers throughout the City that will not infringe on residential neighborhoods for charter buses, charter tour buses as well as interstate buses.  Tourism and intermodal transportation are, and will be, an important part of New York City’s fiscal and green strategy for many years to come.  We need to get this right. 

We do have one benchmark to celebrate, however.  As of July 2011 at least 10% of all hop-on hop-off buses should be using headphones instead of public PA systems on their tours as our 2010 Local Law 15 legislation prescribes.

Ellen Peterson Lewis, Chair, Transportation

Barbara Backer, Chair, Pro Tempore

 

Long-Term Planning and Shorter-Term Relief

Narrow Streets with Parking and Bike Lanes Leave No Room for Turning Buses

Narrow Streets with Parking and Bike Lanes Leave No Room for Turning Buses

Our Streets Our Lives which advocates for City jurisdiction and Community input on tour buses, charter buses, commuter buses and hop-on-hop -off double decker buses is working with the West Side Clean Air Campaign (Manhattan) and with Dumbo and The Fullton Landing groups (in Brooklyn) on new opportunities to affect issues of bus traffic, routing, parking, noise and emissions.

This Tuesday, October 19, 2010 the Mayor’s Office of Long-Term Planning and Sustainability is hosting a Community Conversation to talk about future sustainability initiatives to be included in the updated PlaNYC… and you’re invited:

Tuesday, October19, 2010 – 6:00 pm to 8:pm
Borough of Manhattan Community College (BMCC)
TriBeCa Performing Arts Center, Theater 2,
199 Chambers, Theater 2, NY, NY 10007
Enter through Main Lobby
Please RSVP: Call 212-788-9770 or email CountMeIn@cityhall.nyc.gov
The closest train is the 1, 2 or 3 to Chambers St. 

We urge your attendance and input.  Please RSVP by calling 212-788-9770 or emailing CountMeIn@cityhall.nyc.govIf you are not able to attend, be sure to include your thoughts in an e-mail.   

The first edition of New York City’s sustainability plan, PlaNYC, was released in 2007.  By law the plan has to be updated every four years. The Mayor’s Office of Long-Term Planning and Sustainability is working on the next draft, which, by law, must be renewed every four years, due on Earth Day – Friday, April 22, 2011. 

Issues to Address in the PlaNYC Update 

While Interstate charter and tour buses provide an economical and efficient service for growing numbers of tourists and commuters, their operation and regulation is largely under State and Federal control.  For an already congested City this presents a variety of issues that will only become larger as the fleets and routes expand.  But New York City can plan for more control useful for the whole regulatory environment. 

The effects of increased non-City buses is apparent not only at major NYC crossroads but in residential neighborhoods and on narrow streets, as well.  The dedicated 34th Street Bus Lane is obstructed by long distance buses 75 % of the time.  42nd Street and Chinatown bus lanes experience similar blockage; the supply of appropriate curbside space for layover is vastly insufficient (50%) and is rapidly shrinking due to residential re-zoning and more bike lanes.  In Chelsea and Hells Kitchen in Manhattan, the average number of departures and arrivals of long-distance buses is currently 400 per day.  The Upper West Side -The Dakota, Central Park West (Strawberry Fields), The Museum of Natural History areas; Greenwich Village,Chinatown, Battery Park, South Street Seaport, as well as Brooklyn’s Dumbo and Fulton Ferry Landing experience similar volume.  Over the next ten years tourist travel to the World Trade Center redevelopment site and Lower Manhattan is expected to triple that number.

In addition to the congestion there are emission issues:  Buses using short curbside parking for loading and discharging passengers tend to idle their engines to maintain climate control.  The 400 departures and arrivals, with 10 minutes of idling each totals 66 hours per day of idling emissions, in Chelsea and Hell’s Kitchen, alone. 

There are shorter-term improvements that should be in this plan, as well, such as routing and stop registration.  The current practice of sharing New York City’s dedicated bus lanes negatively impacts MTA Bus Service.  The growing use of narrower residential streets is not only intrusive, but impractical.  The turning radius of a bus (making any corner) is 45 feet, while most of our residential streets are barely 24 feet wide.  Areas designated for on-street parking and bike lanes reduce the lane availability even further.

Two Solutions

(1)  New York City needs to plan for Charter and Tour Bus Garages as well as Commuter and Long Distance Bus Garages.  PlaNYC can prepare the way for suitable infrastructure to support our growing tourist industry and growing use of High Occupancy Vehicles.  In the 2005 Hudson Yards re-zoning, the city committed to building a garage to accommodate bus parking needs.  Similar planning needs to occur for the City’s high-tourist areas, among them Chinatown and the World Trade Center Memorial. 

(2)  A plan for designated routes and stops, particularly for tour buses and hop-on-hop-off busses is sorely needed.  While there are still the State and Federal regulatory issues, New York City can plan and enforce registered routes and stopover locations as part of operating licensing.   The Department of Transportation (DOT)-with the community boards input – could oversee the process to minimize disruption to our neighborhoods and the City’s overall traffic flows.  This also provides a better and more consistent platform for local enforcement.

Regulating Interstate Buses

Competing Bus Signs on 8th St and 5th Ave.

Bus Signs at Fifth Ave. and 8th St. Regularly Ignored

The routes interstate buses, which also include tour buses and sightseeing buses, use within the city include narrow residential streets which result in traffic congestion , noise and threats to pedestrian safety. In addition, interstate buses present a problem throughout the city by parking , as well as loading and unloading passengers and baggage  in areas which interfere with pedestrian and vehicular traffic.    

The City’s Hop On/Hop Off sight-seeing buses do have scattered Tour Bus stops as well as using MTA bus stops;  signs are on the same pole. The problem here is that at a shared MTA stop, MTA passengers often have a problem getting access to their buses when there are also sight-seeing buses at the same stop.

In 2008 and 2009 former Council  Member Alan Gerson introduced to the City Council Intro 836   which required sight-seeing buses to submit route plans to the city for  approval. As defined in the New York City Administrative Code, section 20-372 #4, “ ‘Sight-seeing bus’ shall mean a motor vehicle designed to comfortably seat and carry eight or  more passengers operating for hire from a fixed point in the City of New York  to a place or places of interest or amusement and shall also include a vehicle designed as aforesaid which by oral or written contract is let and hired or otherwise engaged for  its exclusive use for a specific or special trip or excursion from a starting  point within the city of New York.” 

The NYC Dept of Transportation (DOT) has stated that they do not have the authority to regulate interstate bus routes , and parking on city streets and that this is a function of the State. City attorneys agree.  Read the report of the Chinatown Bus Study on suggested solutions to bus parking in NYC.  You can also read more about the issue in this recent NY Times Transit Blog post.

We understand that NYC DOT has drafted some proposed legislation to solve the above interstate bus and sightseeing bus problems and submitted this to the State legislature.  Our Streets Our Lives continues to advocate for city jurisdiction, with community input, for reasonable regulations of bus traffic and parking. However, at this time we do not know any further details of what this legislation contains.

 How can you  help to begin to clarify this  with our legislators and encourage dialogue with citizens about what is needed for a solution? 

In July Transportation Alternatives is partnering with Tri-State  Transportation Campaign to mail a survey to candidates running for a State  office in the MTA area. The survey will include questions submitted from  citizens about how to ensure safer, more livable streets. Write to  info@transalt.org, put Candidate Survey:  City Jurisdiction for Interstate Buses and  Sightseeing Buses  in the subject line, and submit your questions to the candidates.

Contact your State  Assembly and Senate Member.  Also Contact Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver.  Ask them if they are aware of this proposed legislation, and ask to hold public hearings /town hall  meetings  with  citizens about the interstate and sightseeing bus bus issues.  Tell them your story.  Click on the below  links if you are uncertain of your legislators’ email  addresses.

State Assembly Members : http://assembly.state.ny.us/mem/?sh=email 

State  Senate Members:  http://www.nysenate.gov/senators